Some pacifists have carried the sound idea of the prime importance of security too far, to the point of declaring that any consideration of disarmament is superfluous and pointless as long as eternal peace has not been attained.
The Japanese chose the principle of eternal peace as the basis of morality for our rebirth after the War.
Popular Quotes Topics for You.
Related Quotes Topics for You.
You may also like
Frequently Asked Questions
What caution does the first saying raise?
It cautions that pushing pacifist ideals too far can make disarmament seem superfluous rather than genuinely helpful.
Does the second saying reference a historical moment?
Yes, it describes a nation adopting eternal peace as its core moral principle after a devastating war.
Are these sayings fully in agreement?
They approach peace from different angles, one skeptical of extremes and one embracing peace as a guiding ideal.
What broader theme connects both lines?
Both wrestle with how societies balance security, morality, and the pursuit of lasting peace.
Who might relate to this collection?
Anyone interested in the philosophy or history behind pacifism, disarmament, and postwar national identity.
A second line looks to history, describing how a defeated nation chose eternal peace as the guiding moral principle for its postwar rebirth.
